Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F and the cheaper Core i3-10100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10100 - 111 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $93.74 vs $225.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700F - $0.88 vs $2.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
43%
Price, $
$225.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14406 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |