Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 427 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6200 - 223 vs 222 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-6350 - $42.85 vs $55.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6350 - $0.19 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |