Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-875K is 638 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $42.85 vs $180.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-875K - $0.35 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-6200 - 123 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |