Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4440 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4440 is 552 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - $42.85 vs $127.8
- Up to 61% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-4440 - $0.28 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than FX-6200 - 179 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 84 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Buy for $127.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |