Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $48.02 vs $201.33
- Up to 69% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-13400 - $0.49 vs $1.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 30% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-4300 - 127 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
77.16535433070865%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2128 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
30.81761006289308%
Price, $
$201.33
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $201.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |