Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 5396 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 13% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Phenom X4 9650 - 232 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $39.99 vs $201.33
- Up to 77% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-13400 - $0.2 vs $0.87 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
22.98850574712644%
Price, $
$201.33
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $201.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2323 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
205
88.36206896551724%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
10.406646261477919%
Multi-Core
765
7.381319953685836%
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |