Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G2130 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G2130 is 1761 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 8% cheaper than Pentium G2130 - $39.99 vs $43.64
- Up to 11% better value when playing World of Tanks than Pentium G2130 - $0.08 vs $0.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2130 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2130
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Phenom X4 9650 - 507 vs 498 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 55 vs 95 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
498
98.22485207100591%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9650 2.30GHz 533MHz Desktop OEM CPU HD9650WCJ4BGH
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1579 minutes ago
Pentium G2130
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
507
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
88.8888888888889%
Price, $
$43.64
91%
FPS Winner
Intel Pentium G2130 3.20 GHz DUAL-CORE Processor, Socket H2 LGA-1155
Buy for $43.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1582 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Pentium G2130
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
44.15584415584416%
Multi-Core
765
82.6133909287257%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Pentium G2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 21st, 2013 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Pentium |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
