Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2045 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 3% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $52.02 vs $53.55
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4130 - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |