Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 105 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 102 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 35 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
| Rome | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 155 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
