Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i5-4570R on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 2257 days newer than Core i5-4570R.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 7% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i5-4570R - 220 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570R - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570R
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-4570R
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-4570R |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Crystal Well |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris? Pro 5200 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
