Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1794 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Diablo IV than EPYC 7302P - 142 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 85 vs 155 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
