Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 121 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 15% better in Far Cry 6 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 122 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 15 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Rome | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
