Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i5-5350U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 1620 days newer than Core i5-5350U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-5350U - 297 vs 282 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 15 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-5350U |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
No | Overclockable | No |