Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 1794 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 269 vs 266 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 120 vs 155 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
