Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 413 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Athlon 3000G - 134 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |