Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 162 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Athlon 3000G - 136 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |