Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1628 days older than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 20 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 39% better in Valheim than GeForce MX350 - 75 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 4 vs 2 GB
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
