Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 2169 days older than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 20 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than GeForce MX350 - 91 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 3 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
