Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 2316 days older than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 20 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than GeForce MX350 - 105 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 3 vs 2 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
