Key Differences
In short — GeForce MX350 outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce MX350 is 2243 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R7 250E - 47 vs 42 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 20 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 2 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
