Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 2113 days older than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 20 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than GeForce MX350 - 574 vs 518 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 4 vs 2 GB
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
