Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 485 days newer than Radeon R9 295X2.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 5 than Radeon R9 295X2 - 115 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 175 vs 500 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
70%
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$1499 | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 3x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 512-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1018 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
