Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 615 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 443% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Radeon R7 250E - 38 vs 7 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 55 vs 175 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $649 | MSRP | $109 |
| 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| HBM | Type | GDDR5 |
| 4096-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
