Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 485 days newer than Radeon R9 295X2.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Radeon R9 295X2 - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 175 vs 500 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
70%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $649 | MSRP | $1499 |
| 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| HBM | Type | GDDR5 |
| 4096-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
