Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 2188 days older than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 20 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than GeForce MX350 - 169 vs 168 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
