Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1987 days older than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 20 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 19% better in No Man's Sky than GeForce MX350 - 80 vs 67 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX350
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
