Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 815 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 45 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 444% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 49 vs 9 FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
17%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
