Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 270 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 270 is 163 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 45 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270
- Performs up to 19% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 37 vs 31 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R9 270
Desktop • Nov 13th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
15%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
62%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
