Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 197 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 7% better in Dirt 5 than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 90 vs 84 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
95%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
