Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 127 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 45 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 30% better in Battlefield V than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 99 vs 76 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
14%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
35%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |