Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 330 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 45 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 94% better in Alan Wake 2 than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 33 vs 17 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
25%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
