Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 143 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 45 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 35% better in Rocket League than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 253 vs 188 FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R9 290X
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
26%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
