Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 274 days newer than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 45 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - 68 vs 60 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Integrated • Jun 3rd, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
15%
Texel Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
44%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
