Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 618 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 95 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 57% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R7 260 - 72 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 4 vs 2 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R7 260 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$109 | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
