Key Differences
In short — Core i5-650 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-650 is 1061 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1610 - 207 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-650 - €72.66 vs €148.8
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74594 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74594 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
94.87750556792874%
Multi-Core
739
80.67685589519651%
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |