Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €88.88 vs €99.96
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 34% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 195 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - €0.51 vs €0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.96
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |