Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1373 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-8100T - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €78.7 vs €99.94
- Up to 27% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-8100T - €0.58 vs €0.79 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €99.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |