Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €72.66 vs €134.97
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G1610 - 220 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74391 minutes ago
Buy for €134.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
28.648285137861468%
Multi-Core
739
16.03384682143632%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |