Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1697 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - €88.88 vs €140.52
- Up to 34% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 3 1200 - €0.42 vs €0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 220 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Buy for €140.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |