Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €88.88 vs €143.11
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 77% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610 - 163 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610 - €0.88 vs €0.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.11
62%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €143.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |