Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €88.88 vs €195.37
- Up to 49% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-10600K - €0.47 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1610 - 212 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
188
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
51%
Price, €
€195.37
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €195.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |