Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - €72.66 vs €122.66
- Up to 9% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9100F - €0.31 vs €0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 55% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1610 - 360 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
232
64%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9152 minutes ago
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
91%
Price, €
€122.66
59%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Processore 4x3.6 (Boost 4.2) GHz 6MB-L3 Cache Socket 1151
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
