Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3026 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2600K - 174 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - €128.88 vs €148.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2600K - €0.74 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for €148.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |