Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - €72.66 vs €158.3
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 43% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 219 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74465 minutes ago
Buy for €158.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
21.95876288659794%
Multi-Core
739
10.123287671232877%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |