Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - €88.88 vs €188.88
- Up to 46% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-6900K - €0.59 vs €1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G1610 - 171 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |