Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - €72.66 vs €182.66
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Saints Row than Celeron G1610 - 159 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
34.025559105431306%
Multi-Core
739
10.382129811744873%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |