Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1732 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €88.88 vs €379.64
- Up to 75% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.35 vs €1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 271 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
251
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
25%
Price, €
€379.64
23%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen ™ Threadripper 1900X, S TR4, 8 core, 16 fili, 3,8 GHz, 4,0 GHz Turbo, 20 MB, 64 linee, 180 W, CPU, vendita al dettaglio
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
