Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 406 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - €88.88 vs €182.45
- Up to 50% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-2700K - €0.35 vs €0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G1610 - 262 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
254
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |