Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 940 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - €72.66 vs €182.66
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1610 - 179 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74511 minutes ago
Intel Box Core Processore i7-6700, Argento
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
32.94663573085847%
Multi-Core
739
17.85024154589372%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Celeron G1610 or Core i7-6700
World of Warcraft, 1920 x 1080, Maximum
97 FPS
€9.27/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Core i7-6700
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
