Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4380 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €10.42 vs €162.59
- Up to 93% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-12400F - €0.04 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-650 - 288 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €10.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Buy for €162.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |