Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i5-10600KF - 205 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €118.03 vs €160.27
- Up to 26% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12400F - €0.58 vs €0.78 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
74%
Price, €
€160.27
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €160.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€118.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €118.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |